CPEC brings with it a number of projects, e.g., setting up of industrial parks, construction of two major roads, installation of power generation plants, transformation of Gwadar as a transhipment hub, etc
“The CPEC project enjoys a unique geostrategic location, standing at the cross roads of three major engines of growth, including South Asia, China and Central Asia. It will change the fate of three billion people in the region. It will also serve as the hub of a major trade zone.”
Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan’s prime minister.
Australia’s Sea Power Centre believes that ‘the 21st century will be a maritime century’, meaning that much will happen at sea rather than on land. Carefully studying the rise of the British Empire, Alfred Mahan, in his seminal work Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660-1783, argues that prosperity of nations, in great measure, directly depends on their ability to use seas for their interests. Mahan opines that the rise of British colonialism was due to Britain’s unhindered access to sea and its capacity for a sustained control of overseas territories and resources. China is finding itself the same access but with essentially a different disposition to what the British had. Britain did not carry anyone along, they subdued the contemporary maritime nations and fought a great deal to maintain their mastery of the seas. China, on the other hand, pursues the ideal of ‘win-win’, i.e., working its way through a mutually benefiting framework. Renewing the spirit of centuries old silk route, the Chinese have discovered a land-based belt and an ocean-going maritime silk road. The belt and road form the broader initiative of Xi Jinping’s One Belt One Road, which actually is a system of corridors passing through much of Asia and Europe. One of these corridors is China-Pakistan Economic Corridor or CPEC.
CPEC brings with it a number of projects, e.g., setting up of industrial parks, construction of two major roads, installation of power generation plants, transformation of Gwadar as a transhipment hub, etc. Economic benefits are going to be multiplied in years to come, as China would be forced to move its lower grade, less advantageous industry out to Pakistan. Gwadar would provide a natural way out of Chinese products to Africa, Middle East and Europe. As the Chinese economy rises, it would be inclined to outsource much of small industries to other parts of Asia as well owing to cheap labour and low material cost. And once these regions (having Chinese industrial parks) are connected through a belt or a road, then the concept of integration would look more real.
Sailing of MV Cosco and MV Al Hussain from Gwadar Port on 21 November 2016 has been termed as “a watershed event in China-Pakistan ties” by PM Nawaz Sharif. This marks the beginning of the ‘new continuum of prosperity’, i.e., all-inclusive socio-economic uplift predicated on connectivity, industrialisation and integration. This may well be called the ‘era of distributed wellbeing’. Interest of Central Asian states is increasing in CPEC and access to Gwadar, which means rail and road infrastructure to connect these countries will result in greater connectivity. Roads linking Gwadar with Kashghar run across the length of Pakistan, which clearly indicates enhanced connectivity between the remotest and hitherto inaccessible places within Pakistan. Setting up of industrial zones all along the road networks and their final dependence on Gwadar port will ensure a national integration as many parts of Pakistan will have a common interest and stake in the project, i.e., CPEC must remain functional. The steady inclination of Iran and Afghanistan in CPEC would mean a regional integration through gluing their economic interests to Gwadar port and industrial zones, which might spread to these countries on a long term basis. A matrix with different situations is shown below, here it’s computed between the player’s willingness to be part of the strategic continuum of prosperity and prevailing conflicts in the region: